In other words this is not an argument against a Christian theistic belief but an argument for an alternative belief about religion. This is not argued, merely stated or asserted as a given. What, exactly, is the question? This website uses cookies in order to offer you the most relevant information. He suggests that this treats religion like a scientific hypothesis, but questions whether that is reasonable. He explores the question, is Christian belief intellectually acceptable? If nothing in our experience can be identified as God then God refers to nothing. Not much, if any. If God is part of the noumenal realm, rather than the phenomenal realm, and if we can only access the phenomenal realm, then how can it be possible to perceive God? He is not addressing the question of whether it is true or false, but whether it is reasonable, or rational to hold. He believes none of these make serous challenges to the warrant Christian belief can enjoy, if it is true. In the book he explains: a belief has warrant if and only if it is produced by cognitive faculties functionally properly in a congenial epistemic environment according to a design plan successfully aimed at the production of true belief. I believe that I had cornflakes for breakfast, that my wife was amused at some little stupidity of mine, that there really are such ‘external objects’ as trees and squirrels, and that the world was not created ten minutes ago with all its dusty books, apparent memories, crumbling mountains, and deeply carved canyons. It constitutes, after Warrant: The Current Debate and Warrant and proper function, both published in 1993, the last part of his trilogy on epistemology. Memories are hardly scientifically proven and yet we believe them and rely on them. This is a rehashing of secularity. Reg Charity No: 309671. In addition, if God is infinitely powerful, omnipotent, then why would he not be able to manifest himself in our experience? God is a person: that is, a being with intellect and will. Critics claim that Christian belief is not rationally justified or justifiable: what, precisely, is the infirmity or defect they are ascribing to the Christian believer? In fact it leads to the rejection of most of our beliefs, not just theistic ones. In particular, according to Warranted Christian Belief, religious beliefs do not have to be rationally grounded to be rational. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. © 2020 Culham St. Gabriel's Trust. Warranted Belief: Alvin Plantinga. "This book is about the intellectual or rational acceptability of Christian belief." If God is not a finite reality then nothing in our experience can be identified as God. He continues to explore classic arguments against Christian belief (which he calls defeaters) and makes counter-cases. The philosopher of religion, Alvin Plantinga, in his book Warranted Christian Belief advances a detailed account of the rationality of religious, and especially Christian, theistic belief. Performance & security by Cloudflare, Please complete the security check to access. Please accept cookies for optimal performance. However Christians give accounts of perceiving God, in ways such as those recorded in the Bible – through the burning bush to Moses. If knowledge of God is not possible then beliefs in God would be unreasonable. • The existence of external objects are difficult to separate from our perception. How much meets the classical conditions for being properly basic? He suggests that this lays down a standard that the very argument itself cannot meet. A person has (or can have) knowledge and belief, but also affections, loves, and hates; a person, furthermore, also has or …